Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:52:55 -0500 From: Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot issue after upgrade Message-ID: <6f0519e3-48b8-268d-f8c5-56283b63c673@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <8706ecd1205493e8db739db69303c37c.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> References: <mailman.82.1512993607.19895.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <8706ecd1205493e8db739db69303c37c.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Then, I, most humbly, apologize. It seems that CentOS seems to have the same old dependency issues with it's packages that have plagued it. If I go and install the epel and load packages, I still, occasionally, get dependency issues and conflicts on CentOS I don't get those when using RH proper. Of course, most of the packages seem to come down from RH repos. As I said, I've been working with both for the last 10 years along with SuSe, Debian, Ubuntu, etc, etc. Thank you for the correction. P. On 12/11/2017 11:12, James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions wrote: > On Sun, December 10, 2017 22:00, Paul Pathiakis wrote: > >> Yes, CentOS compiles from RH, however, all the most recent ported >> utilities come from cutting edge, not from RH. It leads to >> instability. RH stays with stuff that has stabilized and had the >> bugs shaken out. They leave all of that to CentOS and Fedora before >> incorporating to RH. >> > That statement is false. If you doubt me then send your claim as made > above to Johnny Hughes <johnny@centos.org> and let us know what > response you get. > > We are moving away from CentOS to FreeBSD. But that has to do with > RedHat's desire to become the Linux incarnation of Microsoft and has > nothing to do with the integrity of the CentOS team. CentOS is a > binary reproduction of the corresponding RHEL release; saving only the > copyright and trademark removals. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6f0519e3-48b8-268d-f8c5-56283b63c673>