Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:50:40 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: large RAID volume partition strategy Message-ID: <fa5mq4$v5r$2@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <3A05E0E7-403E-4203-9B9B-AC78549D4E17@khera.org> References: <31BB09D7-B58A-47AC-8DD1-6BB8141170D8@khera.org> <b41c75520708171510i38594117sc55dfabf06ea302@mail.gmail.com> <3A05E0E7-403E-4203-9B9B-AC78549D4E17@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Vivek Khera wrote: > But, if I don't go with zfs, which would be a better way to slice the > space up: RAID volumes exported as individual disks to freebsd, or one > RAID volume divided into multiple logical partitions with disklabel? In general, it's almost always better to do the partitioning in the storage manager (RAID controller, etc.) - this way there's less chance of file system / stripe misalignment. If you really want to use disklabel, read my other post :) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGxl6AldnAQVacBcgRAh9tAJsEEg5O2bjSkZkerNv39/sltU4ERACgmaYm meqQyc0yNLGZ5S+Sce5OUxQ= =7IU5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fa5mq4$v5r$2>