Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:44:08 -0300
From: Marcus Alves Grando <mnag@FreeBSD.org>
To: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org>
Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: compat{4,5}x
Message-ID: <4432F6B8.7070205@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <72A3202F-7561-47CE-8E30-F43CC3B7C17E@xbsd.org>
References: <4432CC3D.5070501@FreeBSD.org> <20060404202354.GA2798@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <72A3202F-7561-47CE-8E30-F43CC3B7C17E@xbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well... New patch using misc/ldconfig_compat http://marcus.grupos.com.br:8080/patch/compat5x.patch Not tested yet. Regards Florent Thoumie wrote: > On Apr 4, 2006, at 9:23 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 04:42:53PM -0300, Marcus Alves Grando wrote: >>> Hi list, >>> >>> Please look my message to portmgr@ about compat{4,5}x ports. >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: compat5x >>> Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 14:35:43 -0400 >>> From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> >>> To: Marcus Alves Grando <mnag@FreeBSD.org> >>> CC: portmgr@FreeBSD.org >>> References: <44317910.7060809@FreeBSD.org> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 04:35:44PM -0300, Marcus Alves Grando wrote: >>>> Portmgr's >>>> >>>> After migrate two servers from 5.x to 6.x, i produce this patch [1]. >>>> This patch fix rcorder to start compat5x before programs compiled in >>>> 5.x. Another point is turn "YES" by default in compat5x. I think if >>>> user >>>> install compat5x that's because he's need. >>>> >>>> Another option is use misc/ldconfig_compat in compat5x. >>>> >>>> What portmgr's thinking about this changes? >>> >>> I agree that compatNx ports should be enabled automatically. I don't >>> know about rcorder issues; please discuss them with the freebsd-rc >>> list. >> >> misc/ldconfig_compat should be used. These sorts of scripts should just >> die for a number of reasons including the fact that rc.d scripts aren't >> supposted to start by default. > > Agreed, I've submitted a patch for bsd.port.mk to integrate > bsd.ldconfig.mk, I hope it'll be integrated soon. In the meantime, it's > still possible to use bsd.ldconfig.mk directly. > > As for not starting services by default, I've had something in mind for > quite some time now. > > I'd like to have all ${name}_enable="YES" in one specific file (say > /etc/rc.conf.local, but I guess people are already using it), default > specific configuration for ${name} in > ${prefix}/etc/rc.conf.d/${name}.defaults and user specific configuration > in ${prefix}/etc/rc.conf.d/${name}. That way everything could be > automated. The port could install ${name}.defaults no matter what, a > ${name}_enable="YES" could be added automatically if something like > AUTO_ENABLE_RC_SCRIPT is defined (and removed automatically too). > > Kris, any chance we have this ports.conf patch and UID/GID files > committed once src/doc trees are tagged? > > --Florent Thoumie > flz@FreeBSD.org > FreeBSD Committer > > -- Marcus Alves Grando marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br | Grupos Internet S/A mnag(at)FreeBSD.org | FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4432F6B8.7070205>