Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:48:05 -0700 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@FreeBSD.org> To: Clark Gaylord <gaylord@dirtcheapemail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation Message-ID: <20040910214805.GN54568@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <41421D66.2030902@dirtcheapemail.com> References: <20040909171018.GA11540@cell.sick.ru> <414093DE.A6DC6E67@freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409091743120.51837@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <41409CB5.836DE816@freebsd.org> <20040909193507.GA12168@cell.sick.ru> <4140B603.8E979D72@freebsd.org> <20040909200052.GD12168@cell.sick.ru> <20040909234126.3f1c7cf3.dudu@diaspar.rdsnet.ro> <20040910053619.GB14470@cell.sick.ru> <41421D66.2030902@dirtcheapemail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 05:32:22PM -0400, Clark Gaylord wrote: > Certainly dumping to MySQL is typically wretched ... to a real database > much less so. works just fine if you aggregate the flows and build lookup tables instead of just dumping raw flows straight into a database. i think it's great that a freebsd netflow implementation exists, it's just a shame that you have to configure netkitchensink to use it.. -- - bill fumerola / fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040910214805.GN54568>