Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:56:45 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! KSE needs more attention Message-ID: <20040607155645.GB66937@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <200406071014.21707.dfr@nlsystems.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406061551210.16558-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <40C37E1C.4000402@freebsd.org> <20040606204817.GB96607@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <200406071014.21707.dfr@nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:14:21AM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Sunday 06 June 2004 21:48, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 02:27:08PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > > >Doug Rabson also has basic TLS support working in perforce. > > > > > > What platforms? My understanding was that new binutils and gcc was > > > needed for sparc64 at a minimum. > > > > Yes. It's i386 only and not even close to being complete. In fact, > > there has been discussions that the thread pointer on i386 needs to > > change. Whether that's the case or not, it's likely that TLS will > > complicate matters way too much to for it to ever work in 5.3. > > Actually its a bit better than that. It works for most use cases right > now on i386 but would get confused on dlclose. I'll fix that before I > move it into current. Does it work on static bound executables? -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040607155645.GB66937>