Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Mar 1996 14:31:30 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk>
To:        rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes)
Cc:        scrappy@ki.net, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: DEVFS vs "regular /dev"
Message-ID:  <199603221431.OAA06826@tees>
In-Reply-To: <199603211856.KAA24142@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Mar 21, 96 10:56:31 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Rodney W. Grimes who said
> 
> These problems may have been corrected.  I do know for certain that certain
> /dev/ entries missing causes the system to hang very early in init, and you
> can not even get up single user to fix it.  This _needs_ fixed badly, you
> should be able to
> rm -r /dev
> reboot
> and get the system up single user, if not you have a chicken and egg
> problem as to how to repair a damaged or loss /dev tree.
> 

This is *exactly* the problem I reported a few weeks ago where I tried to run
with a devfs only system and it hung before getting to single user.

This was what promted my complaints about a lack of fixit floppy since I
was seriously spammed without one.

-- 
  Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd.  (Netcraft Ltd. contractor)
  Elsevier Science TIS online journal project.
  Email: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk
  Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 (0)1865 843155



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603221431.OAA06826>