Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:23:01 +0700 From: Erich <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, "freebs @mail.isc.org>> Current FreeBSD" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD? Message-ID: <1544703.EkgB5WbdBi@x220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <20120605060950.GC32448@lonesome.com> References: <C480320C-0CD9-4B61-8AFB-37085C820AB7@FreeBSD.org> <2188078.y2TVGRxzTH@x220.ovitrap.com> <20120605060950.GC32448@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: > > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), > > only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not > > branched. > > If you create a branch, you must create a tag for that branch. > > However, you can create a tag without creating a branch. That is what > is done for the ports tree. > > It's not particularly easy to see this on cvsweb. But let's take a look > at a random Mk/bsd.*.mk file via 'cvs log': here we are. I never found this. > > RCS file: /home/FreeBSD/pcvs/ports/Mk/bsd.apache.mk,v > Working file: bsd.apache.mk > head: 1.36 > branch: > locks: strict > access list: > symbolic names: > RELEASE_8_3_0: 1.35 > RELEASE_9_0_0: 1.33 > RELEASE_7_4_0: 1.26 > RELEASE_8_2_0: 1.26 > RELEASE_6_EOL: 1.26 > [...] > RELEASE_6_1_0: 1.9 > RELEASE_5_5_0: 1.9 If this list would make it into the documentation, all I asked would be already there. I could write this but my English will need some corrections. If you could give a link to how to do this properly, I would do it then. But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree? Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1544703.EkgB5WbdBi>