Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:41:24 -0600 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> To: John Merryweather Cooper <coop9211@uidaho.edu> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update port: www/screem 0.8.2 -> 0.10.1, repo copy www -> editors and some clean up Message-ID: <opr5qovaw48ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <1080755917.669.11.camel@localhost> References: <200403310656.i2V6uS7p029577@ns1.mezzweb.com> <1080731748.648.12.camel@localhost> <opr5ql9oly8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <1080755917.669.11.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:58:39 -0800, John Merryweather Cooper <coop9211@uidaho.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 09:45, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 03:15:50 -0800, John Merryweather Cooper >> <coop9211@uidaho.edu> wrote: >> >> > A number of points: >> > >> > 1) the update is good as 0.10.1 has just been released and is the >> stable >> > version; >> > >> > 2) the repo copy should be denied unless all of the HTML editors (such >> > as bluefish) are going to be moved from www/ to editors/; >> >> This is next, I am planning to submit about move bluefish to editors. > > This is a bad idea. What about all the other non-broswer utilities in > www/? For that matter, on a purists note one could re-align most of the > ports tree into editors on the grounds that the program was really an > editor modifying a file. Add like 'editors gnome www' should be good as long editors is main. > I think the original intention was that editors would refer to compiler > language editors and text editors, and that other editors would go > elsewhere. Editors is an editor, nothing more and nothing less. As you said, 'text editors' and this HTML editor is a text editor too. :-) Cheers, Mezz -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opr5qovaw48ckrg5>