Date: Sat, 01 Aug 1998 23:49:45 -0600 From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: Stefan Eggers <seggers@semyam.dinoco.de> Cc: Henry Vogt <henry@MX.BA-Stuttgart.De>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: State of current... Message-ID: <199808020549.XAA06153@pencil-box.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Jul 1998 12:10:47 %2B0200." <199807201010.MAA07091@semyam.dinoco.de> References: <199807201010.MAA07091@semyam.dinoco.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199807201010.MAA07091@semyam.dinoco.de> Stefan Eggers writes: : > So this appears to me like a new introduced bug in the shared memory handling : ? : > (Or am I wrong that the difference between :0.0 and <hostname>:0.0 is the way : > IPC between X-Server and -Client ist handled ?) : : As far as I know :0.0 uses a Unix domain socket under /tmp while the : latter form uses TCP/IP. :0.0 is defined to use the best transport possible for the local machine, which in the case of all X servers for FreeBSD uses the unix domain socket. hostname:0.0 uses tcp/ip transport. shared memory is used only for pixmaps in the freebsd x server. Warner P.S. This is for both x inside (errr xig) and xfree86 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808020549.XAA06153>