Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 08:45:01 +0000 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster question Message-ID: <20101108084501.6c0c9994@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011072200560.74543@wonkity.com> References: <4CD6FC57.5020205@blakemfg.com> <20101107203111.37d72c45.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101107145711.1da79e9a@scorpio> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011072200560.74543@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 22:11:50 -0700 (MST) Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Jerry wrote: > > > When using 'portupgrade', I commonly use the '-r' flag in > > conjunction with the previously discussed '-a' flag. While not as > > through as the "-u -p" flags with 'portmanger', it does accomplish > > its goal. > > Isn't portupgrade -a equivalent to -arR? I hope so, or I have a > correction to make... Yes, unless -F is used, in which case -R causes a checksum-recursive target to be used.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101108084501.6c0c9994>