Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:53:44 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Nuno Antunes <nuno.antunes@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Subject: Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question Message-ID: <20061027135344.GB1354@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <262949390610270643i3ce7e9f6k35862587ac546d52@mail.gmail.com> References: <917908193.20061027102647@serebryakov.spb.ru> <ehshjl$dsp$1@sea.gmane.org> <20061027094922.GC6613@rambler-co.ru> <262949390610270643i3ce7e9f6k35862587ac546d52@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 02:43:21PM +0100, Nuno Antunes wrote: > On 10/27/06, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> wrote: > >KSE =3D=3D N:M threading > > > >A 1:1 threading (libthr) is much simpler than N:M threading (libpthread), > >and thus doesn't require KSE support in the kernel; see kse(2) manpage > >for details. Without the KSE option in the kernel, all kse(2) syscalls > >will return EOPNOTSUPP, and a lot of code becomes redundant. > > >=20 > IIRC, I can even remember libpthread being originaly named libkse. >=20 It's still named libkse on sparc64 and sun4v. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFQg9oqRfpzJluFF4RAnm2AJ45J/leyKrPIhOuOosMH5VwIn4TCgCeOjUp Msmo4ZsH9vSarx04A9Qz3Lk= =crJw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061027135344.GB1354>