Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 05:20:00 +0200 From: "Michael Nottebrock" <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: "Gerhard Sittig" <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net>, "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD Message-ID: <004a01c0ff81$3a3093a0$0408a8c0@kiste> References: <01C0FEFE.8EB2BA80.wmoran@iowna.com> <01062713134503.00453@mukappa.home.com> <20010627230347.I17514@speedy.gsinet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Gerhard Sittig" <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 13:13 -0600, Mike Porter wrote: > > On Wednesday 27 June 2001 09:44, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > > Is there a reason why you took this off the list? > > > > my mistake (or my mailer's depending on how you look at it). > > If the majordomo config file for the list included the line > > "reply-to: stable@freebsd.org" then all replies would by > > defualt go back to the list. While this isn't ALWAYS > > appropriate, it usually is.... > > Argh, nooooo! Not again, please! Just do *one* search for > "reply-to" and "harmful" in your favourite search engine and make > sure you understand what's broken about this dumb down approach. > This has been discussed recently (besides coming up again and > again without getting any better by doing so). And read http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml , too. Those two documents should make it very clear, that the whole thing is a typical nonsense religious war, with the only possible conclusion being "I am not the listowner. I can do nothing about it but hit the correct key/button in my mailer & shut up". Greetings, Michael Nottebrock To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004a01c0ff81$3a3093a0$0408a8c0>