Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:04:54 +0000 From: Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk> To: Tai-hwa Liang <avatar@mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> Cc: Bachilo Dmitry <root@solink.ru>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_smbfs trouble after cvsup Message-ID: <1140606294.59408.8.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <06022119291516.78019@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> References: <200602211455.01731.root@solink.ru> <06022119291516.78019@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 19:29 +0800, Tai-hwa Liang wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Bachilo Dmitry wrote: > > I've cvsuped from 6.0 to 6.1-PRERELEASE and now I can't mount NT's shares with > > password. It worked fine before, but after cvsup i get > > mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error > > and in /var/log/messages I get > > Feb 21 14:51:24 notebook kernel: netsmb_dev: loaded > > Feb 21 14:51:27 notebook kernel: smb_encrypt: password encryption is not > > available > > Feb 21 14:51:27 notebook kernel: smb_ntencrypt: password encryption is not > > available > > > > As far as I see, there is no option in mount_smbfs to disable password > > "options NETSMBCRYPTO" in kernel configuartion file. > > > encryption, so I'm just stuck, what should I do? > > Thanks in advance. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2006-January/059823.html Is there a reason this change was made? And is there a reason why NETSMBCRYPTO is not in GENERIC? To me, it seems that breaking smbfs between releases within 6.x violates POLA... I suspect a large number of people (myself included) have always used smbfs for passworded shares and it's "just worked". Moved to stable, where it belongs. Gavin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1140606294.59408.8.camel>