Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:58:01 -0400 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/179443: Rewrite of the Handbook Chapter 16 Jails. Message-ID: <20130616015801.GB1692@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <51BD19B8.3030406@a1poweruser.com> References: <201306151951.r5FJpHun009955@freefall.freebsd.org> <51BD19B8.3030406@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 09:49:44PM -0400, Fbsd8 wrote: > Hello Remko: >=20 > You are way off base here. Your judgment is clouded by things that > have no bearing on this PR. >=20 > The handbook jail chapter rewrite has nothing to do with ezjail or > qjail ports. If you would have taken the time to study the html doc > you would have seen that for your self. Just because qjail was > created by Filipinos who are not knowledgeable in open source > protocol is no reason to insinuate things were done on purpose with > intent. We now know we erred in judgment and have resolved the > problem. So lets put this behind us and move on with this PR. >=20 > The word "rewite" in the PR subject means this html content is > intended to replace the existing content of the current handbook > chapter 16. The PR "subject" sure seem very clear in that meaning. >=20 Well, where is mention of the jail(8) utility in your "rewrite"? Based on a cursory reading, you replaced the native base system functionality with a set of scripts. Where is the information for people who do not want to use your scripts? > If the Doc group members feels that they want to keep the current > outdated handbook chapter 16 content, and add what I wrote as > another sub-section, thats for the Doc team members to discuss and > decide as a group. >=20 > From the tone of what you wrote I don't feel you can be fair and > professional in your judgment concerning this PR. If you can > convince me that you can put the past behind you and change your > attitude them you can work this PR, otherwise just return it to open > status for some other Doc member to select to take it on. >=20 As far as I am concerned, the PR originator's attitude remains negative, and unchanged. I suggest the PR be permanently closed without further review until he decides to reevaluate his harmful (to the Project) point of view. Glen --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRvRupAAoJEFJPDDeguUajsbIH/1VCCWBVGmMlywZBjzCg7TaH uCMQeky32gajWi/BjjvtRyXL8WOALHrKnETtupiYPD1u7gV7xYHFP3pSO5Fc5Cys VtHECz249vTI47+3m4vYwsRB84X9w6Htje5/1ZH/xzaD3rhsGIq1GA6bsx+SOptl LQ3rGjQlp/7yuZifJpmUp5cW5Qkx1PORQj5b/gYu5GDvqflRTDV7X2QpJj5y1tz9 93FzLylSyGcClwUUx6rjqppuA8Fs0SWfSHwnnKUz39X3jR3WX1BjBrS9aB0mnnyS xqvoiQsobxbN0Gl23pyfaqAGq731OCJTGeMDG8f31SR9o1UXpbNyhBKz/WEFvyA= =finl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DKU6Jbt7q3WqK7+M--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130616015801.GB1692>