Date: Thu, 11 May 1995 21:08:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes) Cc: phk@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-sys@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_swap.c Message-ID: <199505120408.VAA02234@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199505120403.VAA14015@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at May 11, 95 09:03:54 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I'm about to jump on the swap-initialization, and having talked > > with davidg about it, I hereby kill two undocumented misfeatures: > ... > > We are getting very close to code freeze for 2.0.5, is this such a good > idea at this time? The kernel seems to be very stable right now, and > as soon as Jordan reviews a document why I am saying this will become > obvious. > The problem is that we will have problems if we don't do this. What I'm gonna do is essentially to move the swapinit() call to when the first swapon is done. That way sysinstall can safely fiddle swap-partitions and later swapon to one of them. Long range plans are more comprehensive, but not 2.0.5 stuff. -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505120408.VAA02234>