Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:37:14 -0600 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/icu Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/devel/icu/files patch-enum-bug patch-install patch-intltest patch-putil Message-ID: <20080208003714.GA11930@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <200802070531.m175VikU015939@repoman.freebsd.org> <200802071629.34089.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <20080208073029.3291b675.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200802071738.20992.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Mikhail Teterin píše v čt 07. 02. 2008 v 17:38 -0500: > Why can't the package-building infrastructure put the > two-and-two together and figure out, that the dependent ports need > rebuilding /without/ explicit PORTREVISION bump? Whether it can or should, the point that's being missed is that right now, it doesn't. Therefore, the port version bumps are necessary. mclhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080208003714.GA11930>