Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:52:10 +0200
From:      des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: absolute vs. relative offsets in disklabel
Message-ID:  <864pwtoorp.fsf@xps.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <20060731203213.GA75233@hades.panopticon> (Dmitry Marakasov's message of "Tue, 1 Aug 2006 00:32:13 %2B0400")
References:  <20060731203213.GA75233@hades.panopticon>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@mail.ru> writes:
> Recent `disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly' thread gave me a
> thought - why do we have absolute offsets in disklabel?

We don't, AFAIK.  Since the transition to GEOM, the offsets are
relative to the start of the containing provider.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?864pwtoorp.fsf>