Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 23:04:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Dmitry Kohmanyuk <dk@dog.farm.org> To: jdn@qiv.com (Jay D. Nelson) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2nd Notice: 4 days to code freeze in RELENG_2_2 branch. Message-ID: <199710030604.XAA04517@dog.farm.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.BSF.3.96.970926195319.253A-100000@acp.qiv.com> you wrote: > Would it be possible to uncomment the HDB capabilities in UUCP for the > next release? Even though UUCP died years ago, I'm converting more UUCP WHAT?? How else are you supposed to do mail backups with other ISP, but with UUCP over TCP to your primary line? The network I set up in university 2 years ago still works this way, and mail goes in and out even if leased line and/or router died. What about hundreds of customers in xUSSR with non-nailed lines (which are more expensive than dedicated ISDN in the U.S.?) etc. As for UUCP in FreeBSD tree, well, there were some problems reported before, but I beleive they were all fixed. -- "AT&T -- anything better is illegal." -- Keith Lofstrom, comp.unix.bsd, "AT&T sues BSDI" thread
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710030604.XAA04517>