Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:11:52 +0200
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SEC:ULarger NGROUPS_MAX in CURRENT ? Ready for 7.0-R ?
Message-ID:  <f9vc51$9vi$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070815104929.GJ11649@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au>
References:  <20070812114017.GA93036@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> <20070815104929.GJ11649@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> Anyone ? rwatson@ ?

AFAIK the only problem with this is that NFS will fail with larger
number of groups, so (for those not using NFS) why not make the number
of groups an item in kernel configurations and make a compile-time and
module-load-time checks for this in the NFS code?


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGwzPeldnAQVacBcgRAhKIAJ9DK19uKdL+5r95HF9oHezacEew0gCZARrm
nZt3se2Mvwhj3PeQpIuIJds=
=X33u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f9vc51$9vi$1>