Date: 17 Nov 1998 14:57:30 -0600 From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: Open Systems Networking <opsys@mail.webspan.net> Cc: Bryan Fullerton <bryanf@samurai.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proc changes Message-ID: <86ogq6yr45.fsf@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: Open Systems Networking's message of "Tue, 17 Nov 1998 07:50:10 -0500 (EST)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.02.9811170748540.21792-100000@orion.webspan.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Okay, what do you think of having lists with *only* heads-up info for >> -current and -stable, with easily accessible archives? > Personally I dont think anyone will read them. They dont seem to read the > *HEADS-UP* messages on current and another list that isnt read is just a > waste of time IMO.Well just have to keep chuggin with what we have and > answer the occasional storm of repeated *me too* problems. I am much more likely to read more of a low-bandwidth list with only messages I know are relevant than a high-bandwidth list with lots of discussion which may or may not apply to what I'm doing. Happy hacking, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ogq6yr45.fsf>