Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 23:05:08 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: fenner@parc.xerox.com Cc: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I rather see the tcp/ip stack fixed than vat patched Message-ID: <199712270705.XAA00514@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 27 Dec 1997 05:56:04 %2B0100." <199712270456.FAA07646@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill care to comment? Tnks, Amancio > Amancio said: > > > I rather see the tcp/ip stack fixed than vat patched > > > > Tnks, > > Amancio > > I brought out the things some time ago but there was not much reaction > or agreement on what to do (yes, I know, I should learn CVS, get commit > privs and act...) > > Furthermore I am not fully convinced that our udp stack is broken. For > the first patch, having loopback on multicast socket is a configurable > feature so there is no point in changin the default behaviour when 1-2 > line change can fix the thing. > > For the ICMP response behaviour, I agree that there would be better > to fix the kernel but the current behaviour is not totally unreasonable. > > Cheers > Luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712270705.XAA00514>