Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:24:12 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 9.0 RC1/Clang / illegal instruction (Signal 4) in gengtype while building cc_tools on i586. Message-ID: <20111023082412.GA74520@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20111022205129.32569ec5@davenulle.org> References: <20111022205129.32569ec5@davenulle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> 0x08048b24 in do_typedef (s=0x80532bf "CUMULATIVE_ARGS", pos=0x805e1a4)
> at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/gengtype.c:103
> 103 {
>
> (gdb) disas 0x08048b24
> Dump of assembler code for function do_typedef:
> 0x08048b10 <do_typedef+0>: push %ebp
> 0x08048b11 <do_typedef+1>: mov %esp,%ebp
> 0x08048b13 <do_typedef+3>: push %ebx
> 0x08048b14 <do_typedef+4>: push %edi
> 0x08048b15 <do_typedef+5>: push %esi
> 0x08048b16 <do_typedef+6>: sub $0xc,%esp
> 0x08048b19 <do_typedef+9>: mov $0x805e1d4,%edi
> 0x08048b1e <do_typedef+14>: mov 0x10(%ebp),%esi
> 0x08048b21 <do_typedef+17>: mov 0x8(%ebp),%ebx
> 0x08048b24 <do_typedef+20>: nopw %cs:0x0(%eax,%eax,1)
LLVM attempts to use an optimal nop sequence when writing N-byte nop,
by using these nop instructions
static const uint8_t Nops[10][10] = {
// nop
{0x90},
// xchg %ax,%ax
{0x66, 0x90},
// nopl (%[re]ax)
{0x0f, 0x1f, 0x00},
// nopl 0(%[re]ax)
{0x0f, 0x1f, 0x40, 0x00},
// nopl 0(%[re]ax,%[re]ax,1)
{0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00},
// nopw 0(%[re]ax,%[re]ax,1)
{0x66, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00},
// nopl 0L(%[re]ax)
{0x0f, 0x1f, 0x80, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00},
// nopl 0L(%[re]ax,%[re]ax,1)
{0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00},
// nopw 0L(%[re]ax,%[re]ax,1)
{0x66, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00},
// nopw %cs:0L(%[re]ax,%[re]ax,1)
{0x66, 0x2e, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00},
};
There's no checking for a supported CPU, is it so that AMD geode doesnt support any of these?
Any other cpu that doesnt support these? If this is CPU dependant, I suggest to open a bug
report upstream as it's a bug.
roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111023082412.GA74520>