Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:58:27 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: mharo@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Meyer <mwm@phone.net> Subject: Re: bin/19635: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does Message-ID: <v04220803b58a161b72db@[195.238.1.121]> In-Reply-To: <16565.962880093@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> References: <16565.962880093@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:41 PM +0200 2000/7/6, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > mfs:26 87M 11K 80M 0% /tmp > /dev/ad0s1f 1.2G 934M 241M 80% /usr > /dev/ad0s1e 193M 92M 86M 52% /var > /dev/ccd0c 1.8G 786M 900M 47% /a > /dev/ad1s1e 1.3G 728M 474M 61% /b > procfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /proc > rodent.ops:/home/ncvs 3.4G 3.1G 36M 99% /usr/home/ncvs > > In particular, I can't believe that 87M - 11K == 80M (I'd expect 86M or > 87M). Nor is it credible that 1.8G - 786 == 900M (I'd expect 1057M or > 1G). You're ignoring the fact that "Size" is the total physical size of the device, while "Used", "Avail", and "Capacity" take into account the 10% (or whatever) overhead that is typically left unallocated for performance reasons. Thus, when "Capacity" shows that ~110% is used, and "Used" == "Size", then you are really and truly completely full on that device. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, <blk@skynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04220803b58a161b72db>