Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:43:00 -0800 (PST)
From:      Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org>
To:        Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com>
Cc:        Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Proposal: Union mount of fdesc on top of /dev
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003271742450.29390-100000@dt051n0b.san.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <20000327180956.L18325@holly.calldei.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Chris Costello wrote:

> On Monday, March 27, 2000, Boris Popov wrote:
> > 	While this may help in the non-devfs case it is not valid for
> > devfs, because devfs is able to handle such things natively and union
> > mount is just an additional overload.
> 
>    At its current pace, however, devfs will be complete and ready
> for production roughly 30 minutes after the Sun explodes.

	And how will that affect the merger?

-- 
    "So, the cows were part of a dream that dreamed itself into
existence? Is that possible?" asked the student incredulously.
    The master simply replied, "Mu."






To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003271742450.29390-100000>