Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 22:19:45 +0100 From: Olivier Certner <olce@freebsd.org> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Cc: Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: noatime on ufs2 Message-ID: <4102492.E50ot47v4H@ravel> In-Reply-To: <13F49F4E-4DC6-45E6-9CCF-25C17ACF63E1@yahoo.com> References: <10218883.mV2X7mr0Zk@ravel> <13F49F4E-4DC6-45E6-9CCF-25C17ACF63E1@yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi, > Let me start out by indicating that some bike shed sessions > (snip) > Much of the overall usage is in that "additional attempted span". Ok, so it seems I've misunderstood what you were saying or your intent in this regard. > I will adjust and deal with whatever happens > overall. That is something I know I can do for my > usage context. With a sysctl knob defaulting to 'atime', you won't have to change anything. Thanks for your participation. Regards. -- Olivier Certner [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCQAdFiEEmNCxHjkosai0LYIujKEwQJceJicFAmW4FnEACgkQjKEwQJce JieAyQ/7BaRGru1h4zAaBIn2tZ6oJqywCRARbFoecQUALHz08Eanyiajjjf4XaLM fYMDDav7ai3qhBJyMqvajLBPJJJgHRCT4NDdCff53cSYQ2Hld9IY9P2YR/EMPHVF 30zb/AHZW6AhiY/O5reUXcEgpb1byniyetrNaPo6U9ryobBui12AoP6mlG+F/6hB 45ZNWd5TWzKCXvb4qCNI/qEWGSELolLQHyiu5QV54makXk5mMWIXe8Y02kSWnUMy IzJg++aULZiJaKH+eL+VeSQ/SLyP0J+oebeBVadxJ6TJLNAZSLSwlHfuIigZwSRh ZiYHK4DI1ozFCPtFl4z4qGt9Y6UT05v+ZRTsvEx8RLdKBx0qatjooaYtwJ5i1bOS twPS1ub2zrCALYWYNtiFao3qSkfQnWoluNdSsM/iq25GfMA6iHJ+R9A0HFES2J6d VXc8c/L0IMBeX8lkyg8VUxypYuUHuZdCOzICJ8nG+aAT3T3cX04vJB6Vvko63R9C UtFOL6cF0IbfMEpe7Mfeb6Z6RtGULpsw88uw1m7WW9gH3lciquWLzkGwPxapRMsp A70dhimNchoFK6mDsOa8GZAgTywH7YZ+3pLbSTmWZfqdqyFpXK9QqlGusXO49hVY jKqFQw1nfMyM7EK6Zcho99A9nsob32J2Q/Slp0bqGimM4rQRZ04= =dV1l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4102492.E50ot47v4H>