Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 10:27:28 -0700 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Alexey Lukin <al@cn.ua> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Missing sio0 and sio1 (was: HELP! Please, HELP!) Message-ID: <199805171727.KAA04009@antipodes.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 17 May 1998 13:55:50 %2B0300." <355EC236.4626669B@cn.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hi, Greg! > > Greg Lehey wrote: > [...] > > ? > > ? I giot the same sort of problems with different new motherboards. > > ? Well, the SIO detection code is TOO sophisticated and does not recognise > > ? MOST of on-board 16550 sios. > > > > I haven't heard anybody claim that before. Can you substantiate this > > claim? Which motherboards have you used? What UARTs do they use? > > Did the patch work with all of them? > > > I tried motherboards of 2 wendors: "Micro Star" (MS-5156) > and few lastI "Iwill" boards. > > All boards have 16550A chips. None of these boards have 16550A chips. Please examine the boards more closely, and report the actual part number from the I/O device. > Linux 2.0.32,33 recognized sio ports and > worked well, > but 2.2.5-R, 2.2.6-R refused to DETECT sio ports. This is correct. Linux does not perform any significant functional tests on the ports before using them. FreeBSD expects the ports to behave as they "should". -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805171727.KAA04009>