Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:26:08 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Richard Coleman <rcoleman@criticalmagic.com> Cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Subject: Re: MFC wishlist Message-ID: <20050112172608.GB16201@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <41E553EB.10809@criticalmagic.com> References: <41DF253C.5040705@fer.hr> <20050108005540.GB93568@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net> <20050108034424.GA94365@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <41E54C51.4000300@fer.hr> <20050112164022.GD28786@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <41E553EB.10809@criticalmagic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 11:44:27AM -0500, Richard Coleman wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > > > >No, because the project has no ability to "assign > >priority/resources". If someone who has is intrested and capable time > >to work on it, does so in time, then it may be done, if not, it > >won't. > > > > Should we take this to mean that none of the developers are interested > in ULE any more? That's the general feeling I get these days. Just > curious. > As Brooks stated, Jeff is busy. He works on it when he can. My problem is that system simply freezes. I can't get a kernel dump, so its hard to provide more info. I'll also note that I believe that there are recent KSE/pthread changes in -current that may be exposing a latent bug in ULE. Jeff's recent ULE changes may actual work on 5.3. No one is stopping you from backport the changes. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050112172608.GB16201>