Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 21:16:22 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/73129: [patch] IPFW misbehaviour in RELENG_5 Message-ID: <20041211101622.GA1430@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20041204221449.GC49503@cell.sick.ru> References: <200412021322.iB2DMxLj066304@freefall.freebsd.org> <20041202134041.GB32699@cell.sick.ru> <41B2200F.FB46E28A@freebsd.org> <20041205005101.H44692@mp2.macomnet.net> <20041204221449.GC49503@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 01:14:49AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 12:53:52AM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > M> IMHO restoring the historic behaviour (even broken in some respects) > M> is the best thing we can do at the moment. > > + my vote. Mine too. > Using 'ipfw fwd' on packets just being nated, is a very common and used > technique. I know several places where people are delaying move from RELENG_4 to > RELENG_5 because of this problem. It doesn't happen often that I break the transparent WWW proxy, the POP3 virus scanner and the SMTP interceptor with one upgrade :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041211101622.GA1430>