Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 00:35:11 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: sos@FreeBSD.org Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>, sos@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in.h ip_fw.h ip_input.c ip_output.c Message-ID: <321C0DAE.695678E2@whistle.com> References: <199608220653.IAA06026@ra.dkuug.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
sos@FreeBSD.org wrote: > > In reply to Bill Fenner who wrote: > > > > In message <199608212137.OAA00329@freefall.freebsd.org>you write: > > > Add hooks for an IP NAT module, much like the firewall stuff... > > > > How does this compare with Julian's IPDIVERT stuff -- I thought that IPDIVERT > > was mostly for NAT-like functionality? > > It does not compare. > These hooks are for a kernel level impl. of NAT which to my best judgement > belongs in the kernel. and we think it belongs out of the kernel.. this way we can both have our way.. (of course we are also using the divert stuff for packet encryption etc. as well.) > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Soren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team > So much code to hack -- so little time.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?321C0DAE.695678E2>