Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 04:55:37 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PORTREVISION bumps on dependency changes (Was: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/freetype2 Makefile) Message-ID: <20010717045537.Z97456@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <3B52EF44.FA989ED0@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:42:36PM %2B0300 References: <200107121008.f6CA8iN37556@freefall.freebsd.org> <7mg0c05n3h.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <3B52CDFB.C125416@FreeBSD.org> <7mae253xxw.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20010716134702.C10331@mithrandr.moria.org> <3B52E709.6514DEC1@FreeBSD.org> <20010716151237.A22423@mithrandr.moria.org> <3B52EF44.FA989ED0@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:42:36PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG) wrote: > The FreeBSD package contains exact version of all packages it depends upon > (@pkgdep), isn't it? So, if one of those packages (library) has been upgraded > then the new package linked against this new library will contain correct > information about which versions of package with library it requires and if > upgrade is performed properly this should prevent from using packages linked > with oldest library with newest one and vice versa. I do not see what > PORTREVISION bump would add into this. How about "I am a package that has been linked with that newer version of the other package with the library bump etc" instead of "I am possibly a copy of the package with the same version number that has been linked with that newer version ..." ? -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010717045537.Z97456>