Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:37:08 -0300 From: "Ezequiel O. Block" <ezequiel.block@eobsistemas.com.ar> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multihomed gateway Message-ID: <431606E4.4030100@eobsistemas.com.ar> In-Reply-To: <72895789@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <4315F3CC.8030206@eobsistemas.com.ar> <65707696@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar> <72895789@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:10:10 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: > >>Boris Samorodov wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, serving 250~ users with >>>>no problems so far, what I need now is to add another ip pool range >>> >>>>from another provider, which means I need to handle two default >>> >>>>gateways, one for each C class network. but it seems that FreeBSD >>>>cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in rc.conf ... i have >>>>googled about it and couldn't find any solution .. anyone here have >>>>had this issue before? any clue? >>> >>>Maybe ipfw fwd action should fit your needs. > > >>mmm I forgot to tell that each client pc gets a public ip address, >>such as 200.43.83.x and the server does proxy arp on them, do you >>think ipfw would be useful in this case? > > > Proxyarp is acting at receiving packets from internet while forwarding > takes place at sending packets. Seems that proxyarp is not an issue > here. > > > WBR You are right Boris, thanks for the info. Ezequiel.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?431606E4.4030100>