Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:35:58 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: I386_CPU Message-ID: <200101180635.f0I6Zws43427@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:35:39 %2B1100." <20010117233539.C9153@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> References: <20010117233539.C9153@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> <200101160947.f0G9lKs11014@mobile.wemm.org> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0101160915000.18917-100000@rac5.wam.umd.edu> <20010116092843.A1858@puck.firepipe.net> <20010117162115.C7752@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> <20010117191618.K1761@puck.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010117233539.C9153@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> Greg Lehey writes: : > Of course. But of these people, which really need 5.x's features over : > 4.x? : : I thought about that, too. I came to the conclusion "probably not", : but 4.x won't be maintained for ever. Compiler technology maybe? But maintainence and "mind share" with the main FreeBSD developer team are also issues that someone in this situation will need to consider. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101180635.f0I6Zws43427>