Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:26:27 +0200
From:      Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP?
Message-ID:  <55B23D03.5060604@omnilan.de>
In-Reply-To: <55B23B4E.1080400@omnilan.de>
References:  <20150710235810.GA76134@rwpc16.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20150712032256.GB19305@satori.lan> <20150712050443.GA22240@server.rulingia.com> <20150712154416.b9f3713893fe28bfab1dd4d7@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <CAGMYy3vKEUCD=Ssxt%2B2Vny4eQ7CNQHTxNKncyQnRk5dPQU6ZtA@mail.gmail.com> <20150712184910.2d8d5f085ae659d5b9a2aba0@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <1436715703.1334.193.camel@freebsd.org> <55B23B4E.1080400@omnilan.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigF3EC2B9B91AD75FA713EDA2A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 Bez=FCglich Harald Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 24.07.2015 15:19
(localtime):
>  Bez=FCglich Ian Lepore's Nachricht vom 12.07.2015 17:41 (localtime):
>> And let's all just hope that a week or two of testing is enough when
>> jumping a major piece of software forward several years in its
>> independent evolution.
> =85
>> I wonder how many other such things could be lurking in 4.2.8, waiting=

>> to be triggered by other peoples' non-stock configurations?  We've
> =85
>
> I'd like to report one, most likely an upstream problem:
>
> 'restrict' definitions in ntp.conf(5) no longer work with unqualified D=
NS names.
> A line like
> "restrict time1 nomodify nopeer noquery notrap"
> results in:
> ntpd[1913]: line 7 column 7 syntax error, unexpected T_Time1
> ntpd[1913]: syntax error in /etc/ntp.conf line 7, column 7

That report is not entirely true, sorry!
It's only the case if the unqualified hostname is of type CNAME.
With A or AAAA records, the problem doesn't occur.

=85
> Has anybody already noticed this problem? And any idea if upstream is a=
ware?
=20
Any hints who to contact best?

Thanks,

-Harry


--------------enigF3EC2B9B91AD75FA713EDA2A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlWyPQMACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8jCUwCfafGVoMDzFdy4fR7KC5hu41gU
iQgAoJUWAHCY8sr31c5UNubhlw++he8I
=wtGD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigF3EC2B9B91AD75FA713EDA2A--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55B23D03.5060604>