Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 02:44:33 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@iafrica.com>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal: Define MAXMEM in GENERIC Message-ID: <36EBF581.FE962C9D@newsguy.com> References: <63209.921431112@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > This was the argument I raised in my original mail. However, it looks Sorry, I missed it... :-( > Anyway, I'm loath for this to turn into an unproductive flame war, so > I won't try to argue an opinion I've already put forward. Instead, I > ask whether there's any other solution you can think of, since we're > likely to see more and more people having problems related to failed > speculative memory probes as >64MB machines become entry-level. As >64Mb machines become entry level, I expect them to start to get their acts together. It's not only FreeBSD that has trouble with troubled hardware, and it will bite the makers otherwise. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "What happened?" "It moved, sir!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36EBF581.FE962C9D>