Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 14:03:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net> To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (FWD) Re: Progs linked against libstdc++ dead... Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9904301359120.22021-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net> In-Reply-To: <19990430114829.B95710@nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, David O'Brien wrote: # > These are good questions, and I don't know enough yet about the issues # > surrounding vtable thunks to answer them. # # I haven't had time to really dig into this yet. Hopefully Saturday. I'm # about to revert the change until I can see what the problem is and what # the upgrade issues will be. EGCS 1.2 *should* be out in the July/Aug # time frame. Of course I will try to upgrade us to it (well 1.2.1 which I # figure will quickly follow). The EGCS maintainers are pushing to get # vtable thunks working properly for 1.2. They seem to work now, but I'll reserve the final judgement for the experts. :-) # Since the Linux config files specify DEFALUT_VTABLE_THUNKS=1, no one has # posted a bug report related to them, there is an option to turn them off, # and this *is* -CURRENT. I may just leave them turned on by default. # # Opinions? I'd like to see them left on. # -- # -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) # To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.10.9904301359120.22021-100000>