Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:32:22 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP Message-ID: <4F0C4BF6.6030401@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <CAHieY7Ty_4_wziq217Y7pAAzGTZOX-0EY%2Bf4J-bgF5_RtCyD4w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJxePNJcTh0QZfr_YOLwN-R1nOrdJETxgMPPm78S35MAsipsug@mail.gmail.com> <aef8c5199b6d01d3fc5d21ac120574a7.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> <CAJxePN%2BGKorAeHCh0HRfUqwAOJ-x%2B_xtPiHk_XDuRAmJWYdgoQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F0C0E3D.7010906@nagual.nl> <CAHieY7Ty_4_wziq217Y7pAAzGTZOX-0EY%2Bf4J-bgF5_RtCyD4w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/10/12 3:09 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> wrote: >> Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef: >>> >>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter<fbsdq@peterk.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I created a jail and within a jail I did >>>>> >>>>> pkg_add -r apache22 >>>>> pkg_add -r php5 >>>>> >>>>> now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php, >>>>> I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://alexus.org/ >>>> >>>> I don't think the package has the apache module by default: >>>> pkbsd:#pwd >>>> /usr/ports/lang/php5 >>>> pkbsd:#make config >>>> [ ] APACHE Build Apache module >>>> >>>> That is unchecked. You'll have to select that and build the port. >>>> ...Or you can use the CGI version which is included in the package: >>>> [*] CGI Build CGI version >>>> >> Yes there is no other way. Personally I find this unchecking rather weird. >> To me apache/PHP are a happily married couple. It makes building a webserver >> on packages only *not* possible and that's stupid imo. >> > > +1 > I second you again here! > > I've read in some PHP forums to stay away from Apache and mod_php and > to use FCGI instead. Maybe this is a trend in the PHP community, but I > couldn't care less because IMO it hurts FBSD in the long run, not to > have the module built by default. > And that's your MO. Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people who don't even *use* apache shouldn't get stuck with a *useless apache module* just because they installed PHP. A possible alternative that would keep everyone happy would be *another* package that actually includes the module, like for example a package called "mod_php5", it would install the stuff from php5 + the apache module.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F0C4BF6.6030401>