Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:06:24 +0000 From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@gmx.de> To: tuexen@freebsd.org Cc: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK Message-ID: <20240313080624.6c73908c@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: <486915F0-456B-4B09-A8BC-93BBA79C4CA1@freebsd.org> References: <42C327BD-6CE4-43AA-A1AE-3BEC08D623DB@freebsd.org> <CAFDf7U%2BU3QpgsG-hY0u3tC_X9WKSRzuAM7Nfhzu-%2BqPBbs1nng@mail.gmail.com> <486915F0-456B-4B09-A8BC-93BBA79C4CA1@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:14:17 +0100 tuexen@freebsd.org wrote: > > On 12. Mar 2024, at 14:39, Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm curious about tcp RACK. > > > > As I do not run on a server background, only a laptop and a rpi4 for > > poudriere, git, browsing, some torrent and ssh/sftp connections, will > > I see any difference using RACK? > > What tests should I do for comparison? > You might want to read the following article in the FreeBSD Journal: > https://freebsdfoundation.org/our-work/journal/browser-based-edition/rac= k-and-alternate-tcp-stacks-for-freebsd/ > > There is no specific area for testing. Just test the stack on > the systems you use with the workload you use and report back > any issues... > In the article we have option TCPHPTS and option TCP_RACK. But in /sys/conf/NOTES we have options TCPHPTS and options TCP_RACK and not option. =2D- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20240313080624.6c73908c>