Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:40:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, mjacob@feral.com, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP discussion moving to freebsd-smp Message-ID: <200006201940.NAA20840@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <55295.961529942@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <200006201936.NAA20788@nomad.yogotech.com> <55295.961529942@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> attitude, having been one of the primary people through the > >> 1.0 to 2.0 transition I know how many developers that cost us. > > > >And how many would that be? I don't remember the masses leaving us > >because of the 1.0 -> 2.0 transition, but because of the lawsuit. > > I recently had reason to go through all the news archives and mail > archives such as they exist, and we lost *a lot* of people between > 1.1.5.1 and 2.0. Most seem to have gravitated to Linux. Again, was that because of the 'current does build' problem, or because of the lawsuit? I'd argue that the lawsuit had most to do with it, which is the reason for the 1.x -> 2.0 move. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006201940.NAA20840>