Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 15:22:55 -0400 From: Drew Baxter <netmonger@genesis.ispace.com> To: Barrett Richardson <rabtter@aye.net> Cc: Peter da Silva <peter@taronga.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ABOUT BSD Message-ID: <4.1.0.67.19981017152234.009772b0@genesis.ispace.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981016234511.21940A-100000@phoenix.aye.net> References: <4.1.0.67.19981016134851.00a9a300@genesis.ispace.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think that might be the problem. See, when I do a route monitor I see a lot of error issues. Sure it works.. But at the expense of a lot of errors. At 12:04 AM 10/17/98 -0400, Barrett Richardson wrote: > >On gated and routing - I've successfully implemented an internet router >with 3 BGP peers over 3 T1's (the routing tables are a little over 50,000 >routes now) and it works like a champ. If all three peers send big updates >at the same time gated 's memory usage approaches around 32 meg. Gated >itself shouldn't hamper performance (unless of course there is >some config problems as mentioned) as it just manages the routing tables >and plays no part in the actual forwarding of packets. > >It is only fair to mention that our 3 T1's saturated is less than half >the bandwidth of saturated switched 10 mbit. > --- Drew "Droobie" Baxter Network Admin/Professional Computer Nerd(TM) OneEX: The OneNetwork Exchange 207-942-0275 http://www.droo.orland.me.us To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.0.67.19981017152234.009772b0>