Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:07:01 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Mateusz Guzik <mjg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fork: pass arguments to fork1 in a dedicated structure Message-ID: <20160204110701.GB88527@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <1454423299.11162.27.camel@freebsd.org> References: <20160201103632.GL91220@kib.kiev.ua> <1454386069-29657-1-git-send-email-mjguzik@gmail.com> <1454386069-29657-2-git-send-email-mjguzik@gmail.com> <20160202131145.GT91220@kib.kiev.ua> <1454423299.11162.27.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:28:19AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > > Would be great to not use initializer in declaration, i.e. use > > bzero() > > instead of c99 designated initializers. > > This would be a better suggestion if the compiler recognized and > optimized bzero() with inline code like it does for those forbidden > assignments. This is imposible until bzero() is nonstandart and implemeted in seperate file.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160204110701.GB88527>