Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:46:34 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Current problem reports assigned to you Message-ID: <20031222234634.GM652@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20031222175937.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20031222225139.GL652@submonkey.net> <XFMail.20031222175937.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--F0luChD47DWseN9q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 05:59:37PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >=20 > On 22-Dec-2003 Ceri Davies wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:09:06PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > >> On 2003.12.22 16:46:32 -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >=20 > >> > On 22-Dec-2003 Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > >> > > On 2003.12.22 14:36:31 -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >=20 > >> > >> Why does qa get two e-mails with two different lists? > >> > >=20 > >> > > I think it's because some PR's are assigned to 'qa' and others to > >> > > 'freebsd-qa'. > >> >=20 > >> > Oof. They all list 'qa' as the owner though. > >>=20 > >> The freebsd- part is stripped from the owner column, but the To field = of > >> the emails still have the real owner address. > >>=20 > >> All the PR's assigned to qa should probably be reassigned to freebsd-q= a, > >> since that seems to be the common form used other places... > >=20 > > Trivially done, but it will result in 126 mails to the list unless I > > lock gnats for a few minutes to do it manually and regenerate the index. > >=20 > > Preferences? >=20 > Whatever is easiest for you. Also, send a note to developers@ perhaps > stating that freebsd-foo is preferred to foo. I suspect it would be easier to handle this in the script that sends the reports in the long term (short of having a list of valid Responsible values). Doing this the manual way to spare the list from spam turned out to be problematic, so if this isn't a cause of major grief then I'll leave the PRs as they were for now and renew my efforts to hunt down the scripts concerned. Ceri --=20 --F0luChD47DWseN9q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/54JaocfcwTS3JF8RAlmZAKCh960jvwMaMmWD8x1Ro5Q1Uh6StQCfT+Hs wEJY4GoFrxGI3fu6qCsrmgs= =6w+l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --F0luChD47DWseN9q--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031222234634.GM652>