Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:13:59 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: David G Lawrence <dg@dglawrence.com> Cc: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, "Jesper B. Rosenkilde" <jbr@humppa.dk> Subject: Re: Suggestions on Avoiding syscall Overhead Message-ID: <86r6q9hnbs.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86veflholn.fsf@dwp.des.no> (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8r?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?grav's?= message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:46:28 %2B0200") References: <f126fae00704221639l68095de1ye7ce9ba3d921bf20@mail.gmail.com> <20070423113400.GC28587@gw.humppa.dk> <462CD251.9060105@freebsd.org> <20070423161711.GV39474@elvis.mu.org> <462D821F.6030707@freebsd.org> <20070424042102.GI38475@tnn.dglawrence.com> <86veflholn.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes: > gettimeofday(2) returns a value in microseconds, but this does not > necessarily mean that it has microsecond precision. s/precision/resolution/ DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r6q9hnbs.fsf>