Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:11:12 -0400
From:      Sean Bruno <sean_bruno@yahoo.com>
To:        "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: gperf -- #define for if (0) ; else for
Message-ID:  <1382663472.2498.2.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1382327705.2610.9.camel@localhost>
References:  <1382327705.2610.9.camel@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 23:55 -0400, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I don't even know why this is a thing in our code base.  Its generating
> a lot of clang noise due to -Wdangling-else
> 
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/src/search.cc:417:15:
> warning: add explicit braces to avoid dangling else [-Wdangling-else]
>               for (int i3 = imax; i3 >= 0; i3--)
>               ^
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/src/search.cc:39:22:
> note: expanded from macro 'for'
> #define for if (0) ; else for
>                      ^
> 
> I see no reason to continue this and propose the removal of the line in
> contrib/gperf/src/search.cc 
> 
>      37
>      38 /* Assume ISO C++ 'for' scoping rule.  */
>      39 #define for if (0) ; else for
> 
> 


Commented out at svn R257085

sean

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSacUwAAoJEBkJRdwI6BaHHtsIAICBdJVQuWgFGoj7lT/dRSw9
KpVARzx6t14bOkE8jW0oUqmwC8qsvb3KBkRVqhvHYLwmP+2OmIulEbiLwkwKzw8W
nGdXSv2Nz3IoZR1AxLCyo6dxvd2f0b+D5Mo0K3u7IuMSARuL444VN7HCoTj/Y+IO
xPpV49aMM3O9LxuBqPwGVyQkGgzP43nskZRaQTHZVrODNBilhKQRhj72JdlLMF4J
GJkHEC2BlDWqZq7a1r/jdVJ7QY94Cu2eoVIa9fEchyZhYYY8bFrNcK0vNCcL9EwM
gZuTNQEq7s2AfTWUqliknIhhnfTxlAihFOLvVKLTAKNm04/P0qB/mZo4dZercoA=
=cOef
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1382663472.2498.2.camel>