Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 17:36:57 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Tor Egge <tegge@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_snapshot.c ffs_vnops.c Message-ID: <20060503172526.H98950@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <200605022352.k42Nqi1s095377@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200605022352.k42Nqi1s095377@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Tor, On Tue, 2 May 2006, Tor Egge wrote: TE> Modified files: TE> sys/ufs/ffs ffs_snapshot.c ffs_vnops.c TE> Log: TE> Close a race when VOP_LOCK() on a snapshot file is attempted at the TE> same time as it is changed back into a normal file. The locker would TE> get the shared "snaplk" lock which would no longer be the correct lock TE> for the vnode. Any chance this (and subsequent) change(s) would fix snaplk errors reported by me? How can I help testing (patch applied cleanly, but I hesitate to test it blindly ;) Thanks! Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060503172526.H98950>