Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:25:25 +0200 From: Damjan Marion <damjan.marion@gmail.com> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARM issue with old binutils Message-ID: <AD95F326-1947-4EBA-8888-0022B90B6C1A@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1106250911230.15592@gerinyyl.fvgr> References: <0C35FE0F-3301-44C6-AC40-233F6C446EBC@gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1106250911230.15592@gerinyyl.fvgr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 25, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Damjan Marion wrote:
>> I see 3 options to fix this:
>>=20
>> 1. Ask clang folks to patch llvm to use old mnemonics ("mov r0, r0, =
rrx" instead of "rrx r0,r0")
>> 2. Maintain same patch for freebsd only
>> 3. patch binutils to support this new mnemonics
>=20
> 4. Finally upgrade to a modern version of binutils.
>=20
> Yes, I know that is GPLv3. Been there, done that, and it is not a =
problem=20
> at all, just FUD. IBM, SAP, Oracle, and all the others are not =
concerned
> about GPLv3 in the toolchain, nor should we. Except for FUD.
Too late. Fix is already in SVN (r223484) :)
Damjan=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AD95F326-1947-4EBA-8888-0022B90B6C1A>