Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 01:53:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Philippe Regnauld <regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CBQ, was: Bandwidth throttling etc. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980427015240.21604L-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <19980427102656.58230@deepo.prosa.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Part of this was committed. setsockopt() can handle upto a cluster now.. pitty about the rest. I didn't see it. On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Philippe Regnauld wrote: > Peter Wemm writes: > > > > Just as a by-the-way, an old open PR was just killed that had an > > implementation change to allow setsockopt() etc to use more than 108 bytes > > of data. (it was part of a much larger change to allow rule selection by > > uid and so on with ipfw. It's a shame it only got noticed on it's untimely > > death, I find that particular set of feature changes particularly > > interesting..) > > Darn, that would have made a great base for an authenticated > firewall gateway... > > Who had submitted the PR ? And was the "larger change" complete ? > > -- > -[ Philippe Regnauld / sysadmin / regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk / +55.4N +11.3E ]- > «Pluto placed his bad dog at the entrance of Hades to keep the dead > IN and the living OUT! The archetypical corporate firewall?» > - S. Kelly Bootle > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980427015240.21604L-100000>