Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:51:03 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Aldis Berjoza <graudeejs@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: Upgrading FreeBSD to use the NEW pf syntax. (Copied from freebsd-pf) Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnk5cUAOzf-w%2BiR__0Rv-=vobs5P7yhvimbuCy9B8uBGA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50ABC214.9060800@gmail.com> References: <op.wn1vxr1jjfousr@box.dlink.com> <CABzXLYPYtQanh5O6%2BTH0=e46P990iXcDoB0apY_BOtzmn9-S7Q@mail.gmail.com> <50ABAF8E.3020101@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <50ABB0C7.7070404@gmail.com> <1023391353430321@web2h.yandex.ru> <50ABC214.9060800@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 November 2012 12:47, Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> wrote: > Nonsense. More options are always preferable to fewer options. Even when those options must be maintained? Documented? Bug fixed? -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnk5cUAOzf-w%2BiR__0Rv-=vobs5P7yhvimbuCy9B8uBGA>