Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:38:53 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: Koichiro IWAO <meta+ports@vmeta.jp>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: xorg-server 1.18.4 segfaults Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1702152035060.12774@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1t60ptmqtFZjA=dXGKXWsGjbFsoEi4V=kq1Re4EEPm8DQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <0101015a3fb1a17f-dc2012c5-b4b3-47f1-b988-4291c158de72-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <20170215064101.GY2092@kib.kiev.ua> <0101015a40a20d8d-7223736a-ce71-4d31-acb6-b9cbce76e6bb-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <0101015a40a437cf-7476a87c-1750-4798-a348-548d767cb3df-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <CAN6yY1s0dQtQ39mX0EA7oVxzrM-ngAbO_Tv-KzyBjAXNAm32AQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1702151616040.46315@wonkity.com> <CAN6yY1t60ptmqtFZjA=dXGKXWsGjbFsoEi4V=kq1Re4EEPm8DQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > > The ports tree still thinks llvm37 is really needed by some of these, and trying to pkg delete llvm37 wants to also delete many installed applications. This seems wrong, but I have seen zero information about this before, so maybe it is > not just my system. I'd be willing to update docs about this, provided someone can clarify just what information needs to be there. `pkg delete -f llvm37' to just delete that, then an entry in make.conf to force llvm39? > > This is odd. I had llvm34 through llvm39. I only found one dependency when I deleted them, an old version of clang. (Deleted it, too.) this is on a system with full MATE desktop and almost 1500 ports. I'm really curious what might have been showing > a run dependency on 37. Did you try re-building them so that they would depend on llvm39? Note: I did not have to do this on my 11-STABLE system which has by far the most ports installed.) My system was in an interesting state due to testing the experimental xorg from https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/newxorg.diff I have updated the ports tree and am rebuilding now. I don't know if that diff has been updated to apply to the present ports tree yet. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 16 03:50:38 2017 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B881DCE158C for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com", Issuer "dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97EB918B5 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:50:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from [74.134.208.22] ([74.134.208.22:60443] helo=localhost) by dnvrco-omsmta01 (envelope-from <mueller6722@twc.com>) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id 43/4F-02660-68125A85; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:50:30 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:50:02 +0000 Message-ID: <43.4F.02660.68125A85@dnvrco-omsmta01> From: "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6722@twc.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of synth following expulsion of John Marino? References: <33.4E.19143.3DE14A85@dnvrco-omsmta03> <3F2A28D7-A3A4-4549-B125-805EC9923F3B@adamw.org> <58A4A227.6080000@abinet.ru> <113653FF-1F93-448E-99C6-9943BBD9DAAE@adamw.org> <6ded5656-51c7-c60d-8a12-2b2b3c7731ac@ShaneWare.Biz> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.6:25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:50:38 -0000 > For every build - > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf > OPTIONS_SET= OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS SIMD PGSQL IPV6 > editors_vim_SET= CSCOPE X11 GTK3 PYTHON > You can also get more specific by using - > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/<setname>-make.conf > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/<tree>-make.conf > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/<jailname>-make.conf > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/<jailname>-<tree>-make.conf > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/<jailname>-<setname>-make.conf > /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/<jailname>-<tree>-<setname>-make.conf > Shane Ambler Is there any way to do this options preconfiguring not using poudriere? One good thing about NetBSD pkgsrc, also Gentoo portage, is being able to set options by package or for all packages in /etc/make.conf or mk.conf . Is there a good way to do this in FreeBSD prior to running synth? I found it very disconcerting to do a massive portupgrade (using portupgrade), going to bed or otherwise away from the computer, and then finding it stopped at a dialog screen. I ran make config-recursive many times, several times on the same port to get what was missed on the first or previous make config-recursive. I am not familiar with the details on planned upgrades to the ports framework and how they will affect usability of portmaster, but remember some users swore by portmanager during the pkg_* days, prior to pkgng. Portmanager could not be made compatible with pkgng and was subsequently dropped from ports/ports-mgmt. Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1702152035060.12774>