Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 12:53:13 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Richard Arends <richard@unixguru.nl> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Resolution (Was: Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD) Message-ID: <200205091153.g49BrDjV014529@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <20020509121148.I91726-100000@mail.unixguru.nl> ; from Richard Arends <richard@unixguru.nl> "Thu, 09 May 2002 12:14:03 %2B0200." References: <20020509121148.I91726-100000@mail.unixguru.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Of course! :). Done, sent to current@ > > Perfect... > > What is preffered: C, Shell ??? The right tool for the right job. For wrapper type things that may be shellscript, for more standalone tasks, I guess C. The programmer doing the actual work has a lot of say in this, of course! M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205091153.g49BrDjV014529>