Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 23:08:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/13049: [PATCH] NFS replies with incorrect source IP Message-ID: <199909100308.XAA23880@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199909100140.SAA37290@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <199909100140.SAA37290@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 9 Sep 1999 18:40:02 -0700 (PDT), Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> said: > Can't it use IP_RECVDSTADDR? [...] > You could rebind the socket before & after sending each reply. That's > probably a high enough overhead that multiple sockets is the right way > to go anyway. Actually, the real Right Thing for all such cases is to fix the broken API so that datagram-oriented applications can specify the entire UDP address tuple <shost,sport,dhost,dport> concurrently with sending the packet. Probably something along the lines of IP_HDRINCL is best (which would be in keeping with the ALF concept). -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909100308.XAA23880>